Mark Berry is quite well known in some parts of the musical world, but many people who do know him or know of him probably won't know that he works not only in the Department of Music but also with the Royal Holloway Gender Institute. Information on the Gender Institute can be found at


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/20/ukraine-first-lady-olena-zelenska-russia-weapons

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/ukrainian-pregnant-woman-pictured-hospital-shelled-russia-dies-rcna19873

A pregnant woman pictured being carried from a Ukrainian maternity hospital after it was badly shelled by Russian forces has died along with her unborn baby, Ukraine's Foreign Affairs Ministry said Monday.

The woman, who hasn’t been named publicly, was photographed Wednesday on a stretcher as she was being taken to an ambulance in the devastation and ruin of the besieged city of Mariupol.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called the attack “an atrocity” and said three people died in the bombing. It is unclear whether the unnamed woman was one of them.

The foreign ministry announced the woman’s death in a tweet and repeated the government’s plea for Western powers to enforce a no-fly zone over the country to prevent future airstrikes.

On Saturday, The Associated Press spoke to Dr. Timur Marin, the surgeon who tried to save the woman’s life, who said her pelvis had been crushed and a hip had been detached. The baby was delivered by cesarean section but showed “no signs of life,” he said.

“More than 30 minutes of resuscitation of the mother didn’t produce results,” Marin said told the AP. “Both died.”


https://mashable.com/article/pregnant-ukraine-instagram-influencer-russia-disinformation

 

 


critical military studies

"matt flinders"

Dear Dr Lavery,

This is a copy of an email I sent to Dr Tidy. I received a reply with the information that Dr Tidy is on maternity leave and the information that emails relating to research ethics in the department could be addressed to you. I do think that the matters I raise in the email to Dr Tidy have a linkage with research ethics, but in a sense which seems a very different in kind. I do, of course, understand that a woman on maternity leave should not be subjected to minor or trivial intrusions but it will be clear that I think the issues raised, which include legitimate defence against aggression, including Russian aggression and Nazi aggression, aren't in the least minor or trivial. I hope, then, that the email can be forwarded to Dr Tidy. The email:

Dear Dr Tidy,

My Website www.linkagenet.com  has pages, many of them very extensive, on a  wide range of subjects. My page on universities www.linkagenet.com/themes/cambridge-university.htm is one of the more extensive pages, with material on universities other than Cambridge. It includes comment and criticism as well as profiles of academics. I intend to add a profile of you to the page soon. The focus of attention will be your views on war and armaments. I may well add profiles of some other academics who, like you, signed the open letter, 'Academics against the arms fair.' Material on my site tends to be highly dispersed. Other pages with relevant material on war and armaments (and gender, since linkages between gender and war are an interest of yours): 

www.linkagenet.com/themes/feminist-ideology.htm  (which contains profiles of some feminist / radical feminist academics.)

www.linkagenet.com/themes/israel.htm  and specifically the section in the 3rd column of the page, 'Democracies and warfare: harsh realities.'

www.linkagenet.com/themes/Ireland.htm and specifically the section

www.linkagenet.com/themes/Ireland.htm#war

www.linkagenet.com/themes/ethics.htm

My Website does have very high Google rankings for a wide range of search terms. These are a few very recent ones  I include some rankings not relevant to these issues, simply to demonstrate the range of the site. 

universities excellence mediocrity stupidity  1 / 3,940,000
ethical depth  3 / 279,000,000
Irish nationalism distortion  4 / 1,690,000
aphorisms ideology honesty  3 / 637,000
Christian religion remembrance redemption  1 / 4,000,000
gardening composting water collecting  1 / 36,800,000
poetry line length  1 / 48,700,000
metaphor theme  7 / 64,400,000   

I realize that the demands on your time may make it impossible for you to look at any of these pages, but if you do look at any of them, you'll find that the site makes extensive use of what I call 'Large Page Design.' Very many of the pages are wide as well as long. They can't be viewed adequately on the small screen of a portable device. A computer monitor or at least a laptop computer is more or less essential. 

I'm familiar with your views on war and armaments (and on war and gender) and will, of course, be reading more of your contributions to these subjects before I write and publish the profile. I'll simply make this brief comment now. I have to say that I find the perspective of the Open Letter you signed very naive. The conflict in Ukraine raises issues which call into question the views of the signatories. My view is that the conflict in Ukraine shows that these views are not just naive but deeply disturbing.  To deny armaments to the Ukrainians fighting against the invading Russian forces would be unjust, monstrous. Other conflicts which show that the views of the signatories amount to a wilful refusal to recognize harsh realities include the allied forces' use of armaments to defeat Nazi Germany and the use of armaments by Israel. Some of the pages already cited will make clear my reasons for taking this view. 

No reply is expected to this email, unless, of course, you feel that a reply would be useful.

Best Wishes,

Paul Hurt
Sheffield






open letter, 'academics against the arms fair'

www.linkagenet.com/themes/cambridge-university.htm

www.linkagenet.com/themes/feminist-ideology.htm

www.linkagenet.com/themes/christian-religion.htm

www.linkagenet.com/themes/israel.htm

3rd column 'Democracies and warfare: harsh realities'

www.linkagenet.com/themes/Ireland.htm

www.linkagenet.com/themes/Ireland.htm#war

www.linkagenet.com/themes/ethics.htm


universities excellence mediocrity stupidity
1 / 3,940,000

ethical depth
3 / 279,000,000

Irish nationalism distortions
4 / 1,690,000

christian religion remembrance redemption
1 / 4,000,000


gardening composting water collecting
1 / 36,800,000

poetry line length
1 / 48,700,000

metaphor theme
7 / 64,400,000




Simona Alexandra  Demilitarise King's

 

Adam Ferhani  https://wrdtp.ac.uk/who-we-are/postdoctoral-fellows-2021-22/


Jonna Nyman
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/politics/people/academic-staff/jonna-nyman

International Politics Working Group at the University of Sheffield.


Owen Parker

https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/politics/people/academic-staff/owen-parker


Melanie Richter-Montpetit
https://profiles.sussex.ac.uk/p349663-melanie-richter-montpetit


Jonathan Silver
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/urban-institute/who-we-are/jonathan-silver


Liam Stanley
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/politics/people/academic-staff/liam-stanley

 

The letter was published on September 18, 2017, and so, before the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which has led for many requests from Ukraine for provision of weaponry to defend itself against the unprovoked attack. These requests are surely fully justifiable. To suppose that weapons are always used 'in reinforcing Western militarism, fuelling conflict, repressing dissent and strengthening authoritarian regimes' is a shockingly naive generalisation. At the time that this fatuous open letter was published, there were many, many uses of armaments which demonstrated the shocking nature of the generalisation, including this, mentioned in my email to Dr Tidy,  'the allied forces' use of armaments to defeat Nazi Germany.' My page on Israel does, I'm confident, provide very cogent evidence that if Israel were unable to defend itself with advanced armaments - but this is not a situation which the Israelis would ever allow to occur - then this would quickly lead to the incursion of forces into Israeli territory. Palestinians would enter in large numbers but a Palestinian state would not emerge, or if it did, would not survive for long. ISIS or similar ruthless terrorist groups would move in and, the plight of women and non-heterosexuals would be extreme, the plight of other groups also. The role of weapons in protecting the right to dissent, in preventing authoritarian regimes from destroying democratic societies, is obviously something which the signatories prefer not to dwell upon. The supposition that only the West should be regarded as militaristic, or that only the West engages in militarism of the worst kind, is profoundly ignorant - or rather, shallowly ignorant. The actions of China, including China's threats against Taiwan, which may one day lead to invasion, should have been taken into account by the signatories before they signed this grossly distorted document. I think that hard questions need to be asked about politics education at Sheffield University and I will be asking some of them

 

Academics Against the Arms Fair: An Open Letter

Last week, about 1500 weapons manufacturers and representatives of more than 100 states descended on London for Defence and Security Equipment International (DSEI) – the world’s largest arms fair. The companies have exhibited products ranging from crowd control equipment and ammunition to fighter jets and military vehicles, which they displayed to militaries, police forces and border agencies from around the world. DSEI is a major event for the international arms trade, and the deals done there play a major role in reinforcing Western militarism, fuelling conflict, repressing dissent and strengthening authoritarian regimes.

Two weeks ago, the Stop the Arms Fair coalition held a week of action in an attempt to prevent the arms fair from taking place. Anti-militarist groups, working in solidarity with activists from countries which have suffered the brutal consequences of the arms trade, held a series of events to disrupt the setup of DSEI. One event during this week was ‘Conference at the Gates’, an academic conference held in front of the arms fair, where participants debated ideas about militarism while taking action to resist it.
We support this week of action and Conference at the Gates, and call on the UK government to end its support for DSEI. As academics working on topics related to war, conflict, security, human rights, and international relations, we are opposed to the presence of this arms fair in London, and to the substantial support provided by the UK government to make it happen. It is wrong to argue, as the government does, that the arms trade contributes to security – it fuels conflict, facilitates repression, and makes the world a more dangerous place. In a world of complex challenges militarism should be regarded as part of the problem, not the solution.

Signed by,

Professor Sara Ahmed, Independent

Professor Nadje Al-Ali, SOAS

Professor Judith Butler, University of California, Berkeley

Professor Boaventura de Sousa Santos, University of Coimbra

Professor Lisa Duggan, New York University

Professor Cynthia Enloe, Clark University

Professor Arturo Escobar, University of North Carolina

Professor Lewis Gordon, Global Centre for Advanced Study; UCONN-Storrs; Rhodes University

Professor David Graeber, LSE

Professor Derek Gregory, University of British Colombia

Professor John Holloway, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla

Professor Richard Jackson, University of Otago

Professor Laleh Khalili, SOAS, University of London

Professor Saskia Sassen, Colombia University, New York

Professor Vron Ware, Kingston University

 

Siân Addicott, Swansea College of Art

Dr Linda Åhäll, Keele University

Dr Kirsten Ainley, LSE

Hilary Aked, University of Bath

Simona Alexandra, Demilitarise King’s

Mehmet Ali, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna

Dr Jamie Allinson, University of Edinburgh

James Angel, King’s College London

Dr Leonie Ansems de Vries, King’s College London

Dr Claudia Aradau, King’s College London

Dr Gordon Asher, University of the West of Scotland

 

Dr Grietje Baars, City University of London

Dr Catherine Baker, University of Hull

Professor Mona Baker, University of Manchester

Dr Sita Balani, King’s College London

Dr Victoria Basham, Cardiff University

Mareike Beck, University of Sussex

Dr Laurie Benson, King’s College London

Professor G. K. Bhambra, University of Warwick

Jon Bigger, Loughborough University

Dr Ira Bliatka, Independent

Professor Lindsey Blumell, City University London

Dr Shannon Brincat, Griffith University

Dr Maria Brock, Södertörn University College

Dr Christopher Browning, University of Warwick

Dr Ian Bruff, University of Manchester

Mirjam Büdenbender, KU Leuven

Dr Sarah Bulmer, University of Exeter

Olimpia Burchiellaro, University of Westminster

 

Dr Rosalind Carr, University of East London

Dr Veronique Chance, Anglia Ruskin University

Dr Catherine Charrett, Queen Mary University of London

Dr Simon Choat, Kingston University

Dr Alex Christoyannopoulos, Loughborough University

Dr Chris Clarke, University of Warwick

Rosalie Clarke, NTU

Dr Thomas Clément Mercier, King’s College London

Professor Cynthia Cockburn, Retired

Lydia Cole, Aberystwyth University

Sam Cook, University of California, Santa Cruz

Amy Cooper, Birkbeck, University of London

Amy Corcoran, Queen Mary University of London

Clare Coultas, LSE

Thomas Cowan, King’s College London

Dr Ruth Craggs, King’s College London

Dr Rhys Crilley, University of Warwick

Dr Giran A. Cutanda, University of Granada

 

Ida Danewid, LSE

Kelcy Davenport, Anglia Ruskin University

Lou Dear, University of Glasgow

Dr Carl Death, University of Manchester

Dr Maria del Carmen Garcia Alonso, University of Kent

Dr Helen Dexter, The University of Leicester

Sam Donaldson, Solidarity

Jack Doyle, University of Oxford

Dr Synne Dyvik, University of Sussex

 

Elizabeth Eade, Brighton University

Dr Cassie Earl, University of Bristol

Dr James Eastwood, Queen Mary University of London

Dr Nathan Eisenstadt, University of Bristol

Dr Emmy Eklundh, King’s College London

Professor Miriam Estrada-Castillo, United Nations University for Peace

Catrin Evans, University of Glasgow

Dr Jonathan Evershed, Queen’s University Belfast

 

Syada Fatima Dastagir, Birkbeck, University of London

Adam Ferhani, University of Sheffield

Peter Finn, Kingston University

Kathrin Fischer, Queen Mary University of London

Dr Adam Fishwick, De Montfort University

Matthew Flinders, UCL

Dr Ludovic Foster, Independent

Dr Maria Fotou, University of Leicester

Guillaume Foulquie, University of Worcester

Dr Sylvia C. Frain, University of Otago & University of Guam

Dr Lola Frost, War Studies, King’s College London

 

Dr Sol Gamsu, University of Bath

Santiago García de Leaniz, EFA European Film Academy

Craig Gent, University of Warwick

Dr Jill Gibbon, Leeds Beckett University

Professor Emily Gilbert, University of Toronto

Dr Ciaran Gillespie, University of Surrey

Dr Rebecca Gould, University of Bristol

Leslie Gonzalez, University of Bristol

Dr Uri Gordon, University of Nottingham

Chloe Gott, University of Kent

Dr Sofa Gradin, Queen Mary University of London

Dr Harriet Gray, University of Gothenburg

Savannah Green, University of York

A Gregg, Independent

Dr Thomas Gregory, University of Auckland

Dr Mark Griffiths, Northumbria University

 

Dr Sandy Hager, City University of London

Jo Hague, Independent

Joseph Haigh, University of Warwick

Professor Janet Hargreaves, University of Huddersfield

Dr Sophie Harman, Queen Mary University of London

Dr Jason Hart, University of Bath

Dr Lou Harvey, University of Leeds

Dr Susanna Hast, University of Helsinki

Josefin Hedlund, King’s College London

Sita Hidayah, University of Freiburg

Dr Andy Higginbottom, Kingston University

Dr Peter Hill, Christ Church, University of Oxford

Dr Michael Hirsch, STFC

Dr Aggie Hirst, Kings College London

Jennifer Hobbs, University of Manchester

Dr Stephen Hobden, University of East London

Professor Jana Hoenke, University of Groningen

Dr Alison Howell, Rutgers University

Professor Jef Huysmans, Queen Mary University of London

 

Dr Marta Iñiguez de Heredia, Institut Barcelona d’Estudis Internacionals

 

Cody Jackson, Texas Women’s University

Louisa Jane Di Felice, Autonomous University of Barcelona

Professor Christina Jarvis, State University of New York

Dr Jamie M. Johnson, University of Leicester

 

Dr Katharina Karcher, University of Cambridge

Dr Oliver Kearns, Independent

Dr Paul Kelemen, University of Manchester

Margareta Kern, University of the Arts London

Professor Ruth Kinna, Loughborough University

Dr Paul Kirby, University of Sussex

Dr Sara Koopman, Kent State University

 

Dr Daniela Lai, UCL

Imane Lauraux, Independent

Dr Andrew Law, Newcastle University

Dr Sophie Lewis, University of Manchester

Matheus Lock Santos, Queen Mary University of London

Dr Matt Lee, Free University Brighton

Iris Loukopoulos, TansActional Athens

Dr Paulette Luff, Anglia Ruskin University

 

Julian Mair, MCI Management Centre

Dr Nivi Manchanda, Queen Mary University of London

Dr Tracy Marafiote, State University of New York

Professor Luke Martell, University of Sussex

Dr Maria Martin de Almagro Iniesta, University of Cambridge

Nicholas Martindale, University of Oxford

Dr Rachel Massey, University of Manchester

Dr Cristina Masters, University of Manchester

Dr Lauren McCarthy, Royal Holloway University of London

Dr Trevor McCrisken, University of Warwick

Dr Kevin McSorley, University of Portsmouth

Dr John McTague, University of Bristol

Angus McNelly, Queen Mary University of London

Rasika Meena Kaushik, Tata Institute of Social Sciences

Dr Akanksha Mehta, University of Sussex

Dr Isabel Meier, University of East London

Dr Katharine Millar, LSE

Colin Millen, Campaign for Unity in Practice and Self-Governance

Amanda Mills, London College of Communication

Dr Laura Mills, University of St Andrews

Dr Lara Montesinos Coleman, University of Sussex

Lena Moore, University of Cambridge

Dr Dalia Mostafa, University of Manchester

Professor Josepa Munoz, Artist

 

Professor Peter Newell, University of Sussex

Dr Marijn Nieuwenhuis, University of Warwick

Dr Kerem Nisancioglu, SOAS, University of London

Dr Jonna Nyman, University of Sheffield

 

Dr Ronan O’Callaghan, University of Central Lancashire

Dr Kieran Oberman, Edinburgh University

Dr Louiza Odysseos, University of Sussex

Sofia Olsson, University of Brighton

 

Dr Ajay Parasram, Dalhousie University

Dr Owen Parker, University of Sheffield

Dr Katy Parry, University of Leeds

Dr Ruth Pearce, University of Leeds

Hazel Perry, Anarchist Studies Network

Dr Simon Philpott, Newcastle University

Dr Veronique Pin-Fat, University of Manchester

Dr Nicola Pratt, University of Warwick

Dr Kandida Purnell, University of Aberdeen

 

Nat Raha, University of Sussex

Sanaz Raji, Unis Resist Border Controls

Dr Elisa Randazzo, University of Hertfordshire

Dr Rahul Rao, SOAS University of London

George Renshaw, Reading University

Dr Matthew Rech, Plymouth University

Henry Redwood, King’s College London

Anastasia Siniori, Westminster University

Professor Dee Reynolds, University of Manchester

Hannah Richter, University of Hertfordshire

Dr Melanie Richter-Montpetit, University of Sheffield

Dr Judith Roads, Retired

Professor Bruce Robbins, Columbia University

Dr Roberto Roccu, King’s College London

Dr Chris Rossdale, LSE

Professor Eugene E. Ruyle, California State University, Long Beach

Dr Caitlin Ryan, University of Groningen

 

Dr Myriam Salama-Carr, University of Manchester

Dr Leon Sealey-Huggins, University of Warwick

Paschal Somers, Coventry Justice and Peace Group

Neil Stamper, Wordpower

Lucy Stroud, Aberdeen University

Professor Paulette Swartzfager, Rochester Institute of Technology

Dr Thomas Swann, Loughborough University

 

Dr Meera Sabaratnam, SOAS, University of London

Dr Elke Schwarz, University of Leicester

Professor Lynne Segal, Birkbeck, University of London

Rasha Shaheen, Academy of Contemporary Music

Dr Laura J. Shepherd, UNSW Sydney

Dr Jonathan Silver, Sheffield University

Dr Tom Smith, University of Portsmouth

Dr Nick Srnicek, King’s College London

Dr Liam Stanley, University of Sheffield

Dr Anna Stavrianakis, University of Sussex

Dr Maurice Stierl, University of California Davis

 

Dr Henrique Tavares Furtado, University of the West of England

Dr Nicholas Taylor, Goldsmiths, University of London

Sahra Taylor, City, University of London

Diana Teggi, University of Bath

Dr Lasse Thomassen, Queen Mary University of London

Professor Charles Thorpe, University of California, San Diego

Dr Joanna Tidy, University of Sheffield

Dr Lisa Tilley, University of Warwick

Dave Tinham, Kingston University

Dr Rebecca Tipton, University of Manchester

Dr Alen Toplisek, Queen Mary University of London

 

Dr Cornelis van der Haven, Ghent University

Mijke van der Drift, Goldsmiths, University of London

Sara Van Goozen, University of Manchester

Tom Vaughan, Aberystwyth University

Professor Stellan Vinthagen, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Eliana Voutsadakis, London Southbank University

 

Dr Dereck Wall, Goldsmiths College

Dr David Wearing, Royal Holloway University of London

Alister Wedderburn, King’s College London/Australian National University

Dr Julia Welland, University of Warwick

Dr Ben Whitham, De Montfort University

Professor Annick Wibben, University of San Francisco

Dr Jeremy Wildeman, University of Bath

Dr Joanie Willett, University of Exeter

Dr Al Williams, Rewilding Wales

Dr Elisa Wynne-Hughes, Cardiff University

Jakub Zahora, Charles University, Prague

Dr Chris Zebrowski, Loughborough University

 

https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/insult-to-injury-as-sheffield-university-cans-exploitative-design-contest

30 March, 2012 


Procurement reform campaigners have blasted the University of Sheffield for abandoning its £25 million ‘Pearl’ music centre contest and wasting up to £1 million of bidders’ resources

From a Sheffield University statement on the matter:

We recognise that this is disappointing for those architecture firms that have submitted bids. However, we will keep interested architecture firms informed about future opportunities with the university.’

In response, Project Compass director Russell Curtis said: ‘This tender process raised some serious concerns from the outset, with interested architects expected to prepare sketch proposals for free for a building seemingly without a brief. The late cancellation of the project just adds insult to injury. If the best that the university can guarantee is that they “endeavour to only advertise opportunities where there is a strong likelihood of proceeding” then they really should take a long, hard look at how they go about it.’

‘Such a laissez-faire approach really does demonstrate a profound misunderstanding of how much time and effort goes into responding to these things. The university claimed they had around 150 expressions of interest, which could well have resulted in over a million pounds’ worth of wasted work.’

Commenting on the lack of a detailed brief, Curtis said: ‘Questions raised during the tender process do nothing to dispel the impression of an inept and exploitative exercise. There’s no sign of even a rudimentary feasibility study to establish the suitability of the site for a project of this scale, nor to set out a basic accommodation schedule on which to base the concept proposals.

‘We sincerely hope that Sheffield University undertakes fundamental reform of its practices before embarking upon the procurement of any future projects.’

One bidder – who preferred to remain anonymous – commented: ‘It’s quite symptomatic of what is going on at the moment with clients who do not have any sense of the burden of wasted time and cost they place on the architectural profession when they have either not organised the project or the selection process adequately or are not realistic about their aspirations. It seems to me no other profession has to go through the hurdles architects are being asked to jump over at the moment when the competition is very intense.’

The bidder continued: ‘A large number of frameworks produce no work and, even when an architect gets on one, they have to go through a selection process again. For even small projects, submissions are either very extensive and unnecessary or compounded by 15-plus architects being approached for the work. I don’t think contractors accept being on a list any bigger than four or five, so why do architects have to be put through this?

‘In reality the site they picked would have been very difficult to make work for the concert hall they wanted, so I think this may have contributed to why they are not going ahead with it.’





incoherent mess details smeared organizing principle unify

https://studenthut.com/articles/ugliest-university-buildings-uk

Any Sheffield students laughing at Hallam's inclusion [for the Sheffield Hallam University Student Union building] can stop now. This red brick uni boasts one of the country's strangest modern buildings in The Diamond. The £81m monster hosts Sheffield's engineering department and was nominated for the 2016 Carbuncle cup, the prestigious prize for the worst new building in the country.

perceptive

Charlie Roberson

Twelve Architects

https://www.dezeen.com/2016/09/01/carbuncle-cup-2016-worst-building-uk-architecture/

The names derive from a comment by Charles, Prince of Wales, an opponent of certain modernist styles and forms and a staunch defender of existing characterisations, themes and points of interest, who in 1984 described Ahrends, Burton and Koralek's proposed extension of London's National Gallery as a "monstrous carbuncle on the face of a much-loved and elegant friend".


Building Design

award-winning

chevron
 a figure, pattern, or object having the shape of a V or an inverted V.  worn on the sleeve by noncommissioned officers incl. police officers as an indication of rank, service etc. imposing, massive opportunity lost