Don't vote for the Green Party. Don't donate to the Green Party.
 
Includes publicity for Sheffield Green Party Councillors.

 

Email 

In this column, images, with text to explain the images. As with the Home Page of the site, scrolling down the page will quickly show the variety of images on the page. More will be added.

 

 

'Look before you leap:' 'Don't act without first considering the possible consequences or dangers.'

 

 

 

 

 

In this column: more illustrations, with explanatory text

 

Pictures of assorted Green Party People and things important to Green Party People, things important for the understanding of these people, reasons to oppose them, reasons not to vote for the Green Party, reasons not to donate to the Green Party.

 

 

 

The Decline of British Comedy

The

Green Party

 

Next, two photographs of a Green Grandee, the Green Party's Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle, followed by a photograph of a Green Party member hoping to become a Green Party Councillor, Andy Davies and a Green Party Supporter, identity unknown. Andy Davies is the candidate for the Walkley  ward, Sheffield, with information about the candidate - my information, not the distorted information he supplies on his election literature. I took the photographs of Andy Davies and the unknown man.

 

 

 

Above, two views of Natalie Bennett, former leader of the national Green Party. Natalie Bennett lives in Sheffield. The second image is 'The Official Portrait' of Natalie Bennett in her role as

 

The Right Honourable The Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle.

 

I know enough about the history of 'Manor Castle' to know that the Bareness's choice of 'Manor Castle' was arbitrary, bizarre, grotesque. The Baroness's  views are nothing special, predictable, Standard Stuff - and bizarre, grotesque.  The fact that she has reached the heights (or the abysmal depths) of the House of Lords proves absolutely nothing.  She supported (of course) and almost certainly still supports 'the boycott of Israeli artists, musicians and academics.'

 

Natalie Bennett! Gordon Bennett!

 

'Gordon Bennett' is an English-language idiomatic phrase used to express surprise, contempt, outrage, disgust, frustration or exasperation.'  [Wikipedia]. I do feel 'contempt, outrage, disgust, frustration and exasperation' for supporters of The Green Party, including the Baroness, but not surprise. I've learned to expect nothing good from these people, to expect the most ludicrous garbage.

 

Perhaps in the distant future the  (temporary) Leader of The Green Party Zack Polanski (real name: David or Dave Paulden)  will be installed in the House of Lords as 'Baron Zack Polanski' of something or other. By that time, it's not likely that his views will have advanced far beyond the crude, ludicrous views he has now.

 

 

Photograph above shows a Green Party supporter, name unknown to me. He was with Andy Davis and other Green Party people at a stall but left quite soon.  There's a photograph of Andy Davies which I took at the same event on the page Publicizing Green Party candidates. When I was taking photographs, the unknown man was unaware that the law allowed me to take photographs in this public place. I was able to correct this very common misapprehension. He preferred not to stay and left soon after. More on photographing Green Party People on the page Publicizing Green Party candidates.

 

 

The photographs of Councillor Dimond in action outside Sheffield Town Hall were not taken by me. I contacted the party to request permission to use the photographs, with blocks obscuring the faces and there was no objection. They show a side of the Green Party which seems not to embarrass the party in the least, not to be a source of shame or regret. In his public persona, this Sheffield Councillor seems to me more like a Nazi Stormtrooper or Nazi agitator rather than a representative in a liberal democracy. To me, this is someone who likes telling people what to think but I doubt if he can explain the reasons for his views or defend his views. Perhaps he is, after all, a very timid person. The appearance of complete confidence is very misleading, surely. Can he defend his views? Can he defend his own behaviour?

 

I use the photographs in various other places, on the Home Page of the site and the page 'Shambolic Sheffield.' The description which appears on the Home Page: Outside Sheffield Town Hall, the ludicrous Councillor Dimond of the ludicrous Green Party makes the ludicrous claim that Keir Starmer is guilty of genocide. He asks the crowd to chant, 'Starmer, Starmer you can't hide, we charge you with genocide and the crowd obliges.

 

So much for the tainted party that tolerates - encourages - this poisonous person, and so many others. These are pictures of the current Green Party MP's / functionaries: The size of the photographs has no linkage with the abilities of the functionary.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Below, public hanging in Shiraz, Iran, 2018. Iran executes on a massive scale. By contrast, Israel has executed only one person in its modern history, Adolf Eichmann, who of course played a major part in a real genocide, the Nazi genocide of the Second World War.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Above, spraying Japanese knotweed with glyphosate at an allotment - not one of my allotments. Japanese knotweed was growing at an allotment very near to mine. It was sprayed with glycophase by Sheffield City Council, the knotweed was eradicated and hasn't regrown.

 

 

I've practically never used glyphosate in my own growing. I've worked hard to attain  largely weed-free growing areas by other means, not involving chemical treatment.

 

Probably, as a rough and ready generalization, ecology is the branch of science which members of the Green Party know most about, if they haven't studied science beyond the age of 16 or so. This has obvious relevance when considering the advantages and disadvantages of using glyphosate. They may be strongly opposed to considering any advantages of glyphosate. They may consider glyphosate harmful in every respect.

 

A much fuller knowledge is needed to come to an informed decision - not specialist knowledge of branches of chemistry and biochemistry and physiology, but much more than a slight knowledge.

 

Full, very technical and not so technical accounts of the necessary scientific background are available, with detailed and not so detailed explanations of the mode of action of glyphosate and its effects on vegetation and the human body and on other organisms.

 

Also necessary is an appreciation of a decision procedure which can be applied in this case, as in so many other cases. I refer to the importance of 'outweighing.' Very often, there are mildly harmful effects or effects that are harmful or exceptionally harmful. If the effects are exceptionally harmful, then this may be a reason for outright rejection.

 

Some medical treatments have very severe side-effects but are used because the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Many medicines have mild side effects or hardly any side effects but in a minority of patients the side effects may be very serious. The medicines are still used because the alternatives would be even worse, much worse.

 

An immense amount of work has been carried out on the actual or potential harmful effects of glyphosate and the consensus, with only a tiny number of informed dissenters, is that the hazards of glyphosate are of a low order. In the scale of possible hazards to life, glyphosate, when used carefully, is very safe.

 

Green Party people - in my experience - ignore so many dangers which are overwhelmingly important. Caring for nature, caring for plants and animals and communities is important, but to ignore the threats to these peaceful activities is grossly mistaken. When Nazi Germany invaded Czechoslovakia, Poland, Belgium, the Netherlands, France, the Baltic states, Russia, then caring for nature and the rest had to become a lesser concern, opposing invasion or taking other action, unnecessary in time of peace, had become far more important, or should have been far more important.

 

The fact that Iran has missiles able to reach this country is a very serious matter. At very long range, missiles are far more difficult to aim but Iran will eventually have missiles sufficiently accurate and with sufficient range to pose an enormous threat to this country and a significant number of others. Green Party people in my experience are somehow unable to appreciate the force of this predicament and many other predicaments. They seem to me to be naive, to be lacking. They put their trust in words like 'Peace.' Using the word 'Peace' offers no protection at all. Putting words together to form simpletons' phrases offers no protection at all.

 

Focusing attention on minor hazards or far-from-minor hazards whilst ignoring very severe hazards is the lazy way. Proper protection generally involves hard, sustained work, great skill, sacrifice and devotion.

 

Below, photographs of Gay Pride in Tel Aviv

 

 

 

Gay Pride in Tel Aviv is a massive event and similar events take place in many other places in Israel. Sexual freedoms are far in advance of all other states in the Middle East. Non-heterosexual people are free to live their lives without persecution or suppression. These particular freedoms and events are one aspect only of a state with far-reaching strengths, which include effective action against a statewhich threatens the security of other states in the Middle East and states much further away, including this country. In the future, Iranian missiles will be a threat to be reckoned with, unless Iran is prevented.  Israeli power will be a massive advantage in deterring Iranian aggression.  Pride parades will do nothing to prevent Iranian aggression but for pride parades to continue, for the freedoms of Israeli society to continue, deterring Iranian aggression and deterring terrorist action will be essential.

 

 Israel has executed only one person since its founding, the Nazi Adolf Eichmann, who of course played a leading part in the Holocaust.  The page on Israel includes detailed discussion of the Holocaust, genocide, the killing of non-combatants in war and apartheid. I show that claims that Israel

is a genocidal apartheid state are shockingly wide of the mark. 

 

It's Israel, not Iran, which receives the full force of the Green Party's fury and the fury of so many other organizations.

 

Iran is one of the most repressive countries in the world for LGBTQ+ people, who are subjected to discrimination, violence again and again, and sometimes killed. Gay men are deemed to have a mental illness. The Iranian penal code explicitly provides for the death penalty and flogging for sex between consenting adults of the same sex. It's estimated that more than 4,000 people have been executed for homosexual acts since the Islamic Revolution. A very wide range of acts are subject to the death penalty, including adultery, prostitution, political dissidence, blasphemy, 'spreading corruption on Earth.' Iran executes on a horrific scale. In one week in 2024, 40 people were executed. Iran is regularly responsible for the majority of the executions taking place worldwide - over 60% of all executions worldwide in 2024. Iranian politician Aziz Akbarian: 'If two people are thoroughly flogged and two people are

executed ... it will be a lesson for everyone else.'

 

 

 

 

 

Please see also the pages

Home Page (contains varied material on the Green Party)

Publicizing Green Party candidates (contains more detailed information on the 2026 election, with questions for candidates.)

Shambolic Sheffield (includes profiles of Green Party Councillors and material on Sheffield Green Party) 

Israel: the case for

The Pro-Palestinian Camp at Sheffield University

Green objections

 

This page was begun very recently and  until recently was the newest page on the site. A great deal of the content has now been transferred to other pages. The questions section has not been inserted as yet. Work on the page will be resumed soon and the content will be revised and extended. 

 

In this column, below

 

100 (approx.) Questions, after a short introduction

 

Varied comment and information

The Alison Teal case

Green Party councillors: brief information

 

100 (approx.) Questions, after this short introduction

 

The questions to be added will sometimes be general questions, sometimes questions for a named individual, each question to be followed by an area of white space, the same width as this column, not long but capable of being extended, to accommodate answers of any length. I would expect very few answers from Green Party members / supporters, and it's likely that there will be none at all - but the white space for answers can be symbolic. It may convey the failure of Green Party people to engage in honest debate, using argument and evidence to defend - and explain - their views adequately. I would expect no attempts or very few attempts to defend and explain to me, but a clannish and complacent and more or less absolute refusal to do that to anyone is a different matter. At least, that's the strong impression which I've received, after lengthy immersion in Green Party publications of one sort or another. It's overwhelmingly unlikely that these people will submit material for publication on this site, of course. What I can do sometimes is to insert extracts from Green Party publications into these white spaces, with proper attribution, to make it clear where the opinions came from.

 

Varied comment and information

 

The Alison Teal case

 

This forms a fairly detailed section on the treatment of the former Green Party Councillor. All the evidence available to me shows that her treatment by Sheffield Green Party was despicable. Green Party councillors who were responsible -  again, according to the evidence available to me - are included in the list of councillors below.

 

100 Questions (eventually, approximately)

 

The Alison Teal case

 

'In August [2022] I stood to be the next PPC for Sheffield Central and was selected as the candidate in September 2022. 

 

The press launch for the selected PPC was intended to take place a couple of days after the votes were tallied but Natalie Bennett refused to attend and the event was cancelled. The Sheffield Green Party never put out a press release about my selection. On 10th October five Green councillors: Martin Phipps, Brian Holmshaw, Alexi Diamond, Angela Argenzio and Ruth Mersereau tweeted: “I am a member of Sheffield Green Party and I support trans rights. I will not campaign for any candidate who discriminates against trans people”. This was perceived as an allegation that I discriminate against trans people, which I do not, however, my former colleagues made this deeply distressing claim and it was widely understood to be about me.

 

“I received a formal complaint from the Green Party on 20th October from Cllr Martin Phipps alleging that I had made transphobic tweets. On 25th October I was told by the party that GPRC had imposed a No-Fault Suspension on me but eight months passed before I was given a reason why. The reasons were just as spurious as the complaint. “

 

'The facts are that none of my tweets are transphobic and I have never discriminated against a transgender person. I have been expressing concern about the impact of gender identity ideology since 2017, starting with a critique of Self-ID and the potential unintended consequences this practice could have (illustrated by the incident of double rapist, self-identifying woman Isla Bryson being sent to a women’s prison in Scotland). 

 

'Multiple failures in the disciplinary and governance process, mostly the result of the flagrant practices of GPRC, led to the continuation of my NFS through to the time that the next GE was called on 22nd May 2024. Because of my NFS status, I could not be removed, according to the constitution, by any means other than a deselection process. This did not take place. However, GPRC saw fit to tell the Sheffield Green Party to go ahead and select a new candidate for Sheffield Central.

 

'I learned about the process of selecting a new candidate from a member emailing me to ask if I minded them standing! No one had the courtesy to formally tell me this decision had been made. I was devastated. I picketed the meeting with friends and supporters but the hustings went ahead and Angela Argenzio, one of the councillors who smeared my reputation, was selected by fewer than 50 votes. 

 

'After working very hard for the party over the past ten years it was extremely difficult to come to terms with how disrespectfully I was being treated. I made the painful decision to resign for the sake of my dignity and with the encouragement of many people I submitted my nomination papers to stand as an Independent candidate on 7th June 2024.

 

'Miscarriages of justice have continued in my name with 15 members of the Green Party being accused of campaigning for me who have now been expelled unconstitutionally by GPRC. 

The body intended to protect the reputation of the Green Party, GPRC, continues to be responsible for bringing the party into disrepute by its own malicious actions. 

 

' I have suffered vexatious complaints  from six named complainants and some anonymous, since 2021. The disciplinary system has created an opportunity for members with strong opinions on gender identity ideology to harass and bully members who understand the vital importance of women’s sex-based rights and also child safeguarding and the way that proposed Self-ID can negatively impact women and children.' 

 

What of the electorate? Will Sheffield Green Party, will the national Green Party, apply the same censorious ideology to the members of the electorate - the majority - who don't take the view that trans issues are more important than furthering the welfare of mothers, fathers, children? Green Party Councillor Brian Holmshaw is chair of the Sheffield City Council Allotment Advisory Board.

 

Does Brian Holmshaw regard issues to do with trans people as relevant to his allotment duties, or are such matters irrelevant? Can he explain. Does he take a censorious attitude to allotment

tenants who don't share his views on trans issues? The many people who don't share his view can't be evicted. In the illusory, deluded ideal world imagined by Green Party People there will be no aggression between nation states, if only they will adopt the Green Party Peace through Pacifism Panacea. If the Green Party is so successful  in local and national elections that it can take and enforce decisions free from tiresome contrary views and other parties - a One-Party Green Party administration, then it will be free to evict people from allotments who have their doubts about the Trans Movement.

 

Revd Lu Skerratt-Love, who makes an appearance on various pages of the site, as a founder-member of the Garden Church near to my allotments and as principal instigator of action against me by South Yorkshire Police. Lu Skerratt-Love was based in Sheffield at the time but moved to Liverpool and was ordained there.

 

This is a short extract from a sermon preached by Lu Skerratt-Love at Liverpool Cathedral:

 

'May we encourage our [trans] siblings to ... raise their voices high so even the stones of our government buildings want to shout aloud for trans rights!'

 

Lu Skerratt-Love may be a member of the Green Party or may not be. I've no information about that, but the opinion of Lu Skerratt-Love, biologically male but affirming 'she' and 'they as

pronouns, about the supremacy of trans rights amounts to a rejection of reality or one aspect of reality - there's absolutely no prospect of a world where public buildings are converted into

promoters of 'trans rights.' To imagine that parenthood and bringing up children are far less important than 'trans rights' is a travesty. Lu Skerratt-Love, Sheffield Green Party, the national

Green Party, are telling people what to think again and again, attempting to suppress any dissent again and again.

 

Alison Teal is one of a large number of former Green Party members who seem to me to have legitimate reasons for complaint against the Green Party. Further information available on the Website 'Greens in Exile,'

 

https://greensinexile.org.uk/

 

It's overwhelmingly likely, I think, that Alison Teal and other contributors to the Website will regard my political views as incompatible with their own, even if there are views we have in common. I share their interest in environmental matters, in nature, trees, other plants, animals, conservation and the rest but there are very significant differences, even so.

 

Sheffield Green Party Councillors: brief information

 

Sheffield Green Party Councillors 

* indicates that a Profile of the Councillor is already provided on the page Shambolic Sheffield. Updated material will be provided on this page.

Number in brackets after name of Ward:

number of votes received by the elected Councillor.

 

*Angela Argenzio (Broomhill and Sharrow, 2601 - 2023 election)

*Alexi Dimond (Gleadless Valley, 2462 votes - 2024 election)

Marieanne Elliot (Gleadless Valley, 2329 voces - 2022 election)

Peter Gilbert (Ecclesall, 3147 votes - 2024 election)

*Christine Gilligan Kubo (Hillsborough, 2762 votes - 2024 election)

Maleiki Haybe (Broomhill and Sharrow Vale, 2675 votes - 2022 election)

*Brian Holmshaw (Broomhill and Sharrow Vale, 2963 votes)

*Douglas Johnson (City, 1362 votes - 2024 election)

*Toby Mallinson (Hillsborough, 2463 votes - 2023 election)

Ruth Mersereau (City, 1119 votes - 2023 election)

Henry Nottage (Hillsborough, 2364 votes - 2022 election)

*Martin Phipps (City, 1160 votes - 2022 election)

*Maroof Raouf (Nether Edge and Sharrow, 2662 votes - 2024 election)

*Paul Turpin (Gleadless Valley, 2094 votes - 2023 election)

 

The page

 

https://www.sheffieldtribune.co.uk/the-inside-story-of-how-the-sheffield/

 

has a ridiculous, over-the-top article written by the founder and chief writer of The Tribune, Dan Hayes, with the title 'The inside story of how the Sheffield Greens rose to power,' published   29.05.2021. This is flagrant exaggeration. The power they do have in the 'Collaborative' arrangement - I'd call it the 'Collaboration' arrangement, where 'collaboration' has a pejorative meaning, as in collaboration with the enemy. No Green Party candidate has won more than 3,000 votes from the voting public, with one exception, and the votes cast were not much higher than 3,000.